Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Congress’

Congressional Field Staffers

Current congressional field staffers spend time connecting with big political donors and supporters or attending meetings directly related to the federal government.  However, most citizens’ concerns and problems are directly or indirectly related to the federal government because many personal choices, decisions and consequences end up in the government’s lap.  “Your mortgage problems stem from the fact that you bought too much house—the size of your finished basement should have been the size of your first house.”

 

For years, I wanted to see Black moderate southern GOP members of congress.  These members would have helped the mindset range of the Black community by pushing conservatism in personal and financial actions and educating our community regarding the logical limited role of government in the post-civil rights era.  In other words, stop digging yourself into holes and reaching for governmental hands to help you out. 

 

Until the GOP has the foresight to produce candidates with a broader appeal in battleground districts, this duty should fall to congressional field staffers—staff in the local offices.

 

Black congressional field staffers have always given inspirational speeches and talks:

 

“If you play in school, you won’t be prepared for work and life.  If you have children before you have a dependable income source or career, you will have a harder row to hoe.  If you spent as much time on homework as practicing basketball, you would be prominent in the NBA—the National Bankers Association.”

 

http://www.nationalbankers.org/

 

 

The standard staff  “role of government/be your best” speech needs more details and specifics to encourage all youth to make deliberate and planned decisions.  For many Georgia youth—both Black and White- these staffers were the first non-educator Black male professionals they ever met.  Seeing a brother in a tie and Blazer who was still cool gave them options.  These staffers planted the seeds of success but having the Obamas in the White House is the ultimate role model situation. 

 

If you are a southwest Georgia high school student, Rep. Sanford Bishop is the only congressman you can remember and that is a good thing—it would have been better if Bishop were the new agriculture secretary.

 

The next level in congressional field staffing for our community should involve more Black women and men who put a conservative element into the standard speeches and talks.  The benefit for our state and country could be significant because many young people don’t have role models who “break it down,” “make it plain,” and “keep it real.” 

 

Somebody needs to do it because the election of President Obama makes the age-old arguments and accuses about oppression seem dated and almost moot.   

 

Republicans are often reluctant to hire Black congressional staffers because they think all Blacks are liberals.  If this mentality persists, the GOP will continue to marginalize themselves.  With secondary consideration to party politics, the best future for GOP Black outreach will be based on conservatism with a practical foundation.  Michael Steele wants to take the GOP in that direction or to add that aspect to their mission; the grassroots in the GOP might reject his efforts.

 

Congressional Black field staffers in both major parties can and have served as bridges into our communities for elected official in the same way farm-raised White staffers bridged certain groups for Black congressmen with rural areas.  Finally, I am proud to say I worked for three Georgia members of congress who actually had staffers in D.C. and Georgia who came from the other party.  Constituents from the “other party” knew their opinions and views were heard in our “fair and balanced” policy debates in our Democrat offices—the same can’t be said about most southern Republican offices when I was a staffer.

Read Full Post »

What should we learn from the money part of the 2008 elections as we prepare for the 2010 mid-year elections?  Obama, love him or hate him, revolutionized the process by getting much money from little donors (little meaning small amounts not short people.)  When people give you money to run a campaign, they will be the first once at your office with a wish list.  Sometimes the items on the list are in the best interest of most Americans, other times the items serve the agenda of a few.

 

During the 2008 elections, I grew weary of the campaign ads blitz with a quickness.  The same short on substance ads over and over and over again had me watching T.V. with my finger on the remote control.  And I knew that someone did a whole lot of fundraising to finance those ads.  Are the members of congress spending time studying the federal government and proposed legislation or looking for dollars.

 

I want to mention great southern gentleman congressmen who often ate breakfast in the Rayburn House Office Building cafeteria (oatmeal with raisins) rather than the member’s dining hall—maybe he was avoiding his begging colleagues because he was chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.  Congressman William Natcher had the respect of staffers because he never missed votes, did not take campaign contributions and funded his campaigns himself from 1953 to 1994.  

natcher

 

Of course, Natcher brought that pork to Kentucky and had votes that most southerners made back in the day but he should be an example for current candidates who really wants to run and win differently.  New Media gives candidates the opportunity to connect with voters without bombarding them with the same expensive ads. (What about five-minute campaign web videos on the top 10 issues and posting video from a dozen debates and forums?)  Smarter voters are starting to realize the “real” candidates cannot enter the arena without the lofty cash the system demands. 

 

If a candidate was smart and innovative, he/she could run for congress with a relatively small amount of money and label the other candidates as “bought and paid for” by national special interests.  The special interest money in the innovative campaign should be posted on the web and directly related to the state’s economy.  The people might appreciate a Natcher-type official over a money-hungry politician.   President Clinton’s remarks when Chairman Hatcher passed said it best:

 

 

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=49891

 William J. Clinton

Statement on the Death of Representative William H. Natcher

March 30, 1994

Hillary and I were deeply saddened to learn of the death of Congressman William Natcher. We want to extend our deepest sympathy to his family, friends, and staff for their great loss. For the past 40 years, Bill Natcher has served the people of Kentucky’s Second District with distinction and uncommon dedication. Earlier this month, I visited Bill Natcher at Bethesda Naval Hospital where I presented the Presidential Citizens’ Medal to him. The citation for that medal offers a fitting remembrance of Congressman Natcher’s career: “Few legislators in our history have honored their responsibilities with greater fealty or shunned the temptations of power with greater certainty than William Huston Natcher.”

Bill Natcher governed and campaigned the hard way. He never missed a rollcall vote or a quorum call in the House for 40 years. He never took a campaign contribution. He never made a political commercial. He never hired a press secretary. He read and answered his own constituent mail. He drove through the small towns and farms of central Kentucky visiting the people he represented at county courthouses and general stores. He paid his campaign expenses out of his own pocket and never had to spend much money. In an era of sound-bites and high-tech media campaigns, Bill Natcher was a rarity.

Some may think that Bill Natcher’s death marks the end of an era in politics. I hope not. I hope that Congressman Natcher’s devotion to public service serves as an inspiration to the young men and women of America for as long as his voting record stands. Bill Natcher once said he wanted his tombstone to read, “He tried to do it right.” Let us all carry those words forward in his honor and memory.

Read Full Post »

Former Georgia 12th congressional district candidate John Stone recently announced that he is taking a position back in Washington and will not be a candidate for that seat in 2010.  His decision is a good idea because that district (and the 2nd and 8th) is for a moderate GOP candidate—those don’t exist…yet.  The correct GOP candidate for these three districts would be a Republican version of the Democrat’s Blue Dogs—someone ideologically near center.

 

If Democrat voters have learn to live with Bishop, Marshall, Scott and Barrow being near center, then Republicans need to do the same with certain candidates in certain races.  But, arrogance prevails and they want all GOP candidates to be far right 100% of the time—you can’t win like that.  Secondly, arrogance is present when any party or group won’t honestly admit when their team could have done things better.  I give John Stone credit for truthfully analysis policy problems from the right and left during his congressional campaign.  Stone must have realized that winning that seat would have required him becoming a political chameleon and in his heart that was something he could not do.

 

During the Obama inauguration, my mind went to his battle with Senator Hilary Clinton.  Basically, Clinton and Obama helped define yet other like Larry Bird and Magic Johnson. I don’t think voters would have consider him “tested” enough without that challenge from Clinton and later McCain.

 

Potential Georgia congressional candidates should spent 2010 listening to the people and finding their voice.  Of course, hopefuls might learn that there are not right for the race in their area.  A candidacy could be positioning for future races after redistricting. (It is hard to explain that to your spouse.)

 

In the 2nd congressional district, we were caught off guard by the possibility of Congressman Sanford Bishop leaving for the U.S.D.A.  Who is the 2nd district heir apparent?  Could we grow an Albany-Valdosta area person to replace Bishop when President Obama makes him a cabinet member in the future?  Tifton, Albany and Valdosta should be in one congressional district and Bishop deserves to have a Columbus-based district.  Yes, Congressman Westmoreland is right about modifying the Voting Rights Act because (to me) Moultrie and Covington have no business in the same district and the same is true for Columbus and Valdosta. 

 

http://westmoreland.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=2029

 

Competitive contests keep incumbents on their toes and groom the next generation of leaders.  The Albany Herald newspaper reports that the GOP 2nd District Convention will be April 18 and the GOP State Convention will start on May 15.  By mid-April, moderate GOP contenders for Scott, Bishop, Barrow and Marshall emerge should—think Obama, Palin types.  These candidates might not win in 2010 but the redistricting committee will have something to consider.

 

Moderate GOP candidates in heavy African American districts should be reasonable conservatives who will sit at the table with the new administration and push conservative elements into the new agenda.  (Like Newt improving the Clinton agenda on budget and welfare reform.)

 

This morning former GOP congressman Joe Scarborough (currently of MSNBC) told Congressman Artur Davis that many congressional Democrats also endorsed the Bush policies.  This great point opens the door for critical analysis of the rubberstamping Democrats by new-style GOP and Dem candidates.  “President Obama is rebuilding from Democrat miscues also.”

 

Oh boy, President Obama is about to open up with both barrels regarding personal responsibility and “ask not what this country can do for you..”  Is that from JFK or Newt?  So, the next logical question is why didn’t the Democrats start this discussion in the past.  In fairness, Bishop and the Blue Dogs have tried on some level, but Havard Law grad Rep. Artur Davis of Alabama is one of the leaders of the new school with Obama.  Where does that leave the old school?

 

Political diversity for our community is an objective of this blog and we believe a smiling, positive conservative with a rich civic resume could move the GOP forward and received new support from across the racial and political spectrum.   Steal a play from the Dems playbook; stop living in the past.  To me, getting positive southern Republicans is what’s next for the South.

Read Full Post »

I thought that headline would get your attention. And I’m sure it did. Of course, I want you to vote for a candidate for the office of President of the United States. But I wonder. I just wonder how many of you know of anyone else’s name and/or seat that is on the ballot this year. Gotcha’. A vote for the President is not going to impact you as much as voting for a local or state seat. Or even Congress for that matter. We’re focusing so much on the Presidency, that I have a feeling many people will go to the polls and vote for the first item on the ballot (President) and then leave. And that’s a shame. Why don’t you check with your local Board of Elections and get a sample ballot. You might be surprised to see there are Congressional races, local county and/or city commission races, U.S. House of Representatives, Judge seats, Sheriff, or even Board of Education.

Let’s take the time to focus on the races that really matter. These are folks you might see at your local grocery store, a community event, a local high school football game or even your place of worship. 

These are individuals who have made a commitment to serve in a public office, and they deserve your respect AND your vote.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts