Federal programs on rural housing should have options to suit the real world needs of the people. President Obama’s UDSA is very active in improving the quality of life in rural America; so I tip my hat to everyone involve from Secretary Tom Vilsack to local office specialists. We shouldn’t forget the authorization and appropriations of the U.S. House and Senate. However, I would love to see a little flexibility in rural housing programs.
The Direct Rural Housing Loan Program seeks to get low income people into new homes. We know that the economy is stimulated when new houses are constructed and that home-owning families are the backbone of our nation. To my understanding, this program would put a family with an income between 20 and 30K in a house between 90 to 124K. The highest cost house would be a net zero home, a home with advance energy technology that zeros out the utility bill.
While that concept sounds wonderful, everyone can’t afford wonderful. To me, your financial obligations reflect your pocket and that goes for car, children and homes. If you grew up struggling, your mentality should be that of Scarlett O’Hara when she said, “As God is my witness, I will never be hungry again.” Okay, invoking Scarlett is being a little dramatic but low income people should have a preoccupation with building wealth (nest egg) and living inside their means—everyone should.
When a family has more house than they can comfortably afford, it’s called house poor. Of course, USDA has guys smarter than me calculating affordability. However, 20 or 30 years is a long time for a person to service a “house note” when their income is from a job rather than a more stable career. Current families are often single parent or one income so that’s one layoff from housing disaster. Actually, the recent mortgage crisis was exacerbated by the fact that unemployed people with houses didn’t have the mobility to search for employment elsewhere.
I grew up in a small community of USDA and VA homes and the general rule to me is double your income—a house should comfortably cost twice a family’s income. For example, a single mom with an income of 25K can afford a 50K home. That amount won’t get you a new home other than a mobile home. Mobile homes can be really nice but we are too close to the hurricane region. If I had a trailer, you can best believe I would brick it up…I know, not a good look.
In rural Georgia, 50k will get you an older home but the headaches will come from concerns about the bones. Bones of homes to me are the foundation, wood framing, roof, plumbing, electrical, etc. and that’s before worries about energy cost from HVAC, windows, doors, insulation and dated appliances.
USDA should better market their current programs to qualified citizens. If they find a considerable amount of surplus funding, a program should be created to help people retro-fit older homes…perhaps homes in the family. Grandma passes away and the family wants 30K for her 1980s USDA house. The new owner could do a 20K energy-based renovation and still have a house for half the cost of the earlier mentioned USDA program. I think some agencies in the federal and state governments are doing this now.
I would take an older house on a concrete slab and go to work. If the house has siding, I would remove it and put in state of the art insulation. The best colleges and technical schools should be researching ways to blow foam insulation under the house, in the roof and into exterior walls. The answer might be gutting the drywall inside the house to create a proper insulation shell from the inside.
In rural counties, more families are moving out into the county and that’s nice. Often, the county seat is a town left to slowly decay but it shouldn’t be that way. Those older homes could be a first step for some families and they can pay off that house then get a new home later.
My high school Economics teacher was a Vietnam bombardier and had a master’s degree. When he looked into how much the house he wanted would cost, he went to the technical college at night and on the weekend to learn construction. Mr. Tomlinson reduced the cost of his house considerably by putting in that work himself. In Georgia, we have an excellent technical college system and the presidents of those institutions display amazing flexibility regarding community needs.
These schools and the four year regional colleges once had active continuing education programs. We need a short-time certification program that would prepare a homeowner to do demolition, insulation and certain other tasks on a renovation.
I can read faces and some families are reluctant to tell USDA housing officials that certain programs are a little too rich for their blood. These families don’t know that the Clinton Administration was and the Obama Administration is all ears….let them hear from you and let’s get working folks into affordable homes.